On Saturday night, a friend and I went to a rally for Eric Chu in Zhonghe City. We were a bit late because the traffic on the freeway was horribly backed up. He joked that it was probably all the people going to the rally. Of course, that would be ludicrous; no rally has that many people. However, after our normal 30 minute trip took 90 minutes and all the other roads leading away from the rally were completely clear, it became apparent that it really was the rally. I think they were unloading all their busses in the slow lane, so that the slow lane backed up to the freeway exit, which eventually backed up to Xindian. Wow.
There were quite a few people at the rally. The site was big enough for 12000-15000, but it wasn’t quite full. There were large gaps of seats that were completely empty, while other blocks were completely full. Well, that’s what happens when most of your crowd is mobilized. Of course, mobilized people are still people, and there were a lot of them. I estimated about 9000, give or take a thousand. (My estimates tend to be a lot lower than most people’s. This is because I count people rather than simply pick a big number out of the air.) It wasn’t a bad crowd. There was a reasonable amount of energy. If the speaker was boring, the crowd wouldn’t pay much attention. However, if the speaker got them involved, the crowd did respond.
Some of the speakers included legislators Wu Yu-sheng 吳育昇 and Hung Hsiu-chu 洪秀柱, county executive Chou Hsi-wei 周錫瑋, and party elder Wu Po-hsiung 吳伯雄. After my description of Hung’s speech in the Da-an Park rally (which I did NOT, in fact, call the “garden of hatred”) made such a stir on the internet, I feel obliged to comment on her speech this time. Huang repeated some of her speech about Chen Shui-bian, who she still refused to call by name. She still said that they had felt dissatisfied 悶 while waiting for a court ruling on Chen’s cases. However, this time she did not use the word “hate.” I repeat, she did not use the word “hate.” Actually, her whole speech had a lot less passion in it this time. Maybe she decided to tone it down, but I think the most important thing is probably simply that another week has gone by. Time moderates most passions. The crowd in Da-an Park didn’t react too strongly, and this crowd had even less reaction. I wouldn’t call it boredom, but perhaps it was mild interest.
The best speaker of the night was County Executive Chou Hsi-wei. When they introduced him, he got a very warm reception. You are reading correctly: the guy who was not popular enough to be re-nominated was the star of the night. Chou launched into a passionate speech that really grabbed the crowd. I think he got a little carried away by the moment and went a little overboard. Near the end of his speech, he screamed “Down with the DPP” 打倒民進黨, a line that sounds like it comes from the Cultural Revolution. But the crowd was with him, and he was probably letting off a year of pent up frustration.
Neither Chu nor Ma was at their best. Ma inherited a riled-up crowd (from Chou) and proceeded to put them to sleep. It was the KMT’s 116th birthday, and he talked for 5 minutes about the origins of the KMT. He tried to sell us on the idea that the loss of Taiwan to the Japanese was instrumental in Sun Yat-sen’s dissatisfaction with the Qing court. In other words, the KMT’s establishment was closely linked to Taiwan. A) I don’t remember Taiwan being a critical factor in any of the accounts I’ve read, and B) this very dry topic sucked all the energy out of the crowd. The rest of the rally wasn’t very memorable.
Overall, it was a reasonably good rally. It wasn’t great, but it wasn’t a disaster. (This seems to be my judgment about everything associated with the Chu campaign.)
Tags: Chou Hsi-wei, Eric Chu, Hung Hsiu-chu, rally
November 22, 2010 at 11:28 pm |
After my description of Hung’s speech in the Da-an Park rally (which I did NOT, in fact, call the “garden of hatred”) made such a stir on the internet,….., this time she did not use the word “hate.”
You know what, Nathan ? Without your description of what really happened in her previous speech, and without the “stir” that followed, most probably she would have kept singing the same tune of hatred, like those blue TV commentators whose tone is like wanting all members of Chen’s family dead, innocent or not.
That is, your report has helped steer Taiwan toward a “less-hatred”, possibly more harmony society !!
Do we need to have an agenda like “I want to help” ? No. You simply report the truth. And that’s enough to make the world better.
I think we should all thank you for that.